What Amplemarket Costs: $600 a Month, 2 Users, 2 Meters

Amplemarket runs two meters, not one. Email credits and phone credits are separate allowances, and the published entry plan grants 13,500 of the first and 600 of the second, per user, per year.

Six hundred phone credits a year is fifty a month.

A rep working a phone-led territory spends that in the first week and then has eleven months of email. Which means the tier a calling team needs is the first one without a price on it, and that is the single most useful thing to know before anyone books a demo.

The rest of this page is the arithmetic: what $600 a month actually costs per user, per credit and per phone number, what the ratio between the two meters does as you climb the ladder, and what the same money buys from vendors that sell data and nothing else.

What does Amplemarket cost?

$600 a month on an annual term, including two users. Growth and Elite are Custom.

There is no free tier and no checkout. The entity record here carries freeTier: false and selfServe: false, verified 11 August 2026, which is an unusual combination for a vendor that does publish a price: you can read the number and you cannot act on it without a call.

Annualised, $600 a month is $7,200 a year, which is $300 per user per month and $3,600 per user per year across the two included seats [computed]. None of those three figures appears on the vendor's page.

Look down the phone row

Startup to Growth multiplies phone credits by more than eight while email credits go up by two and a half. The step between the tiers is not a general uplift. It is almost entirely about the telephone.

Divide one row by the other and the shape becomes clearer still. Startup grants 22.5 email credits for every phone credit. Growth grants 7. Elite grants 4.2. The ratio compresses steadily as you climb, which means the three tiers are not three sizes of the same product. They are an email tool, a mixed tool and a phone tool, sold under one ladder.

Work out which of the three products you are actually buying before anyone quotes you for it, because the tier names do not say and the credit rows do.

What the published tier costs per credit

$7,200 a year buys two users, 27,000 email credits and 1,200 phone credits between them.

The middle figure is the fair one and it still lands high. At 25.5 cents a credit blended, this sits above every data vendor in this directory that sells contacts by the credit except the on-success waterfalls, and roughly double Lusha's list rate for revealing an email.

But that comparison stops meaning much quite quickly, because Lusha does not send anything. This is sequencing, mailboxes, warming, signals and data on one contract, and the right thing to price it against is the stack it replaces plus the person who would otherwise wire that stack together.

What $7,200 buys from a vendor that only sells data

One comparison is an anecdote. Here is the whole data-research shelf in this directory, which is what the data half of this bundle is being bought instead of, with the date each figure was read.

Amplemarket's $600 a month is roughly double the highest published entry price in that entire category, and BuiltWith at $295 is the one it doubles. Sixteen of these twenty-four publish a rate, and fifteen of the sixteen sit at $99 or below. That is not an argument against the price, because none of these sixteen sends anything: the comparison the $600 has to win is against a data vendor plus a sequencer plus mailboxes plus an intent source on four separate bills, which is the consolidation case the rest of this page makes.

It is an argument about which half of the bundle to interrogate. Nineteen of the twenty-four data tools here sell without a call and fourteen run a free tier, so the data half is the half you can benchmark for nothing before the quote conversation. Across the whole 264-tool directory, 114 publish no rate and 108 need a sales call, and Amplemarket is in the second set but not the first, which is why the published Startup meters are worth as much as they are.

Worth doing explicitly, because it is the comparison a buyer runs in their head badly and on paper never.

Forty-eight thousand complete contacts against twenty-seven thousand emails and twelve hundred phone numbers. That is the trade in one line, and it is not the whole trade, because LeadMagic will not send an email for you, will not warm a mailbox, will not tell you when somebody changed jobs and will not give you a sequencer.

So model it as a replacement for a stack rather than as a data vendor. The number to beat is what you currently pay for sequencing, mailboxes, warming, enrichment and a signals tool combined. If that total is under $7,200 and somebody maintains it happily, stay where you are.

Mailboxes are the quiet part of the ladder

Two per user on Startup, four on Growth, eight on Elite.

Mailbox count is the main lever a team has on deliverability, because the same volume spread across more inboxes lands better than through fewer. That makes the tier ladder a deliverability ladder as much as a credit one, and it is worth pricing that way. If you already pay for mailboxes, domains and warming elsewhere, some of what you are buying here is already on your card.

Signals are the actual reason to choose this

Job change alerts are metered too, at 500 monitored contacts on Startup and 2,000 on Elite.

A job change is the most reliable trigger in outbound, because somebody who has just moved has a budget, a mandate and no incumbent relationship, and if they were a customer at their last company they already know you. Monitoring that automatically is a genuine reason to prefer a bundled platform over an assembled stack, and it is a better argument for this product than the data is.

Five hundred monitored contacts is a small list, though. It is the champions you have already sold to and not much more. Decide which five hundred before you buy, because the allowance forces the choice whether you make it deliberately or not.

Custom data requests are zero on the tier you can price

Startup grants none. Growth grants four and Elite twelve.

Bespoke research is part of what the platform is sold on, and it is not included at the price you can read. That is the same pattern as the phone credits and it is worth naming as a pattern rather than as two separate complaints: on the tier that publishes a number, two of the things the product is marketed for arrive at zero or near zero.

You can read the price and you cannot buy it

The entity record carries entryMonthly: 600 with selfServe: false, verified 11 August 2026.

That combination is worth understanding rather than treating as a contradiction. A published price with no checkout means the number is a qualifying device: it tells buyers under a certain size not to book, which saves everyone a call, and it commits the vendor to a floor it then negotiates upward from. This site has written about the wider pattern of prices and checkouts coming apart in both directions.

Practically it means two things for you. The $600 is a floor rather than a quote, and the annual term is attached to it, so the smallest commitment on the table is $7,200 [computed] and there is no monthly path onto the product at all.

The trial exists and its length is not published

All plans include a free trial. No duration appears on the page.

That is the cheapest thing on offer and the first thing to use, because the two questions that decide this purchase are both answerable inside a fortnight: how many phone credits would you actually spend in a month, and does the data cover your territory. Test phone coverage separately from email coverage, because they are separate meters drawing on separate datasets, and a blended result tells you nothing about the constraint that binds.

Who should buy it

• Email-led teams, where 13,500 credits a user a year is generous and the 22.5-to-1 ratio is describing your actual motion rather than working against it.
• Teams who want signals, sequencing, mailboxes and data on one contract and are currently paying five vendors for that.
• Anyone who would act on a job change rather than admire it, which is the strongest trigger in outbound and the best thing in this product.
• Teams not already paying for mailboxes, domains and warming, since that spend is inside this contract and double-paying for it is the most common way this purchase gets mispriced.

Who should not

Where the two meters break

The $600 is an annual commitment for two users, so the first real decision point is not the invoice. It is the moment the ratio between the two meters stops matching the motion, and that arrives faster than most buyers plan for.

The phone meter runs out first and it is the one with no upgrade price. Startup grants 600 phone credits per user per year against 13,500 email credits, which is 22.5 to 1. A rep who begins dialling in month three exhausts a year's phone allowance in weeks, and the only tier that fixes it is the one with no published price. Going into that conversation without your own measured ratio means negotiating against a number only the vendor can see.

The mailboxes are a second meter with its own failure mode. Warming and sending capacity is part of what the bundle sells, and sending capacity is the component most sensitive to what happens to your domain reputation after a bad list. If the data half underperforms, the sending half degrades with it and the bill covers both, which is the consolidation risk that mirrors the consolidation benefit.

And nothing published says what happens to unused credits at term end. The category answers that question every possible way: Lusha wipes annual credits at cycle end, UpLead's do not roll into a renewal, BookYourData's never expire, and NeverBounce expires pay-as-you-go credits after twelve months. On an annual term with two meters, that clause is worth more than a discount. Get it in writing before signing, along with the renewal uplift cap.

Anyone who dials. Fifty phone numbers a month per rep is not a calling motion, and the tier that fixes it publishes no price.

Anyone who needs a published price for the tier they would actually buy, which is a different requirement from wanting the vendor to publish something. Anyone already running a stack that works with somebody to maintain it. And anyone who cannot commit to an annual term, since that is the only basis the quoted rate exists on.

The five questions before the quote

• Count the phone credits you would actually spend in a month and compare it to fifty. That single number decides which tier you are really shopping for and therefore whether any published price applies to you at all.
• Test phone coverage separately from email coverage on your own territory rather than a demo list, because they are two datasets behind two meters.
• Price your existing mailbox, domain and warming spend before the negotiation, because some of it is inside this contract already and you should not pay for it twice.
• Pick your 500 job-change contacts deliberately, since the allowance is small enough that the choice matters and it is the highest-yield signal in the product.
• Ask for the renewal uplift cap in writing. There is public discussion of a pricing change this site has not verified, which makes it a reasonable and answerable question rather than a rumour.

So should you buy it?

If your outbound is email-led and you currently pay five vendors to do what this does, yes, and the $7,200 is probably not the expensive option.

Sequencing, mailboxes with warming, enrichment, job-change monitoring and a data layer on one contract is a real consolidation, and the credit rows are exposed honestly enough that you can model it before the call, which most vendors in this bracket do not allow.

If anybody on your team dials, stop reading the published tier. Fifty phone numbers a month per rep is not a calling motion, and every question you have is about Growth, which has no price. Go into that conversation with the ratio in hand, because 22.5 to 7 tells you exactly what the upgrade is for and what you should be paying for it.

What this page does not know