Skip to content

Lusha Review (2026)

Contact data sold by the seat and metered in credits, where revealing a phone number costs five credits and an email costs one.

3.9/ 5
Transparency4.8
Cost honesty3.2
Capability3.3
Independence5.0
Predictability2.8
How this is calculated

Some links on this page can be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no cost to you. This never affects our rankings. How we stop it.

Visit Lusha ↗All data & researchWe earn nothing if you click this. Lusha has no affiliate programme with us.
Entry price
$449.40/yr
Model
usage
Free tier
Yes
Self-serve
Yes
Ownership
Independent
Payments
No payment

Lusha in Depth

A phone number costs five credits. An email address costs one.

Both figures are published, on the same page as the prices, under a heading called Credits breakdown that almost none of the pages ranking for Lusha pricing quote. They decide what this product costs you, because the plans do not sell contacts. They sell credits, and credits buy different things at very different rates.

Lusha is bought for direct dials. The meter charges five times more for a dial than for an email.

What a credit costs

The pricing page opens with a slider: I need a plan with N credits per year. Moving it repositions everything below. Re-read on 2026-08-12, and the whole ladder has been rebuilt since our first pass. The stops are now 40, 24k, 48k, 72k, 96k and 120k+, and every paid card reads billed yearly. The tier name is still not the price. Credit volume is the price, and the tier is a label attached to wherever the slider happens to stop.

Which makes cost per credit the only figure worth carrying into a spreadsheet. At list prices, billed annually, read off the vendor's page on 2026-08-05:

PlanShown / monthCredits / yearPer credit
Starter$37.454,800$0.094
Pro at 24,000$171.4524,000$0.086
Pro at 26,400$188.9526,400$0.086
Premium at 48,000$308.7048,000$0.077
Premium at 72,000$454.9572,000$0.076
Premium at 96,000$604.9596,000$0.076
Premium at 120,000$754.95120,000$0.076
Computed from published rates, not measured. Monthly list price times twelve, divided by the credits the plan grants for the year. The rates are the vendor's, the division is ours, and no invoice has been run through an account we hold.

Correction: we published that this curve ran backwards, and on the current page it does not. Our first reading found Premium at 40,800 credits costing more per credit than Pro at 26,400. Re-read on 2026-08-12, the ladder falls at every step, from 9.4 cents a credit on Starter to 7.6 on Premium at 120,000. Twenty-five times the volume still buys only about a nineteen percent better unit price, which is a shallow curve by any standard — but it is a curve, and it points the right way.

There is a discount ladder running down the page, and it is still easy to mistake for a volume rate. Starter is badged 25% off, Pro 30%, Premium 35%, and a separate badge above the slider deepens from 30% to 40% as you ask for more credits. When we first read this page the badges sat under a Summer Sale banner; that banner has gone and the percentages have not. The reward for buying bigger is expressed as a bigger discount from a figure nobody pays, and the price of a credit barely moves.

One inversion does survive, inside a single tier. The page opens with the slider at its leftmost stop, and in that state Pro is quoted at $188.95 for 26,400 credits. Slide right to the 24k mark and Pro drops to $171.45 for 24,000 — a worse allowance at a better rate, $0.0857 a credit against $0.0859. The default view is not the cheapest way into Pro.

The seat charge is a second meter

Pro includes two seats, Premium five, and both cards still carry a stepper. On our first pass, adding a third seat to Pro raised the price without moving the credit allowance at all — seats and credits are separate purchases. We have not re-measured the seat increment against the rebuilt ladder, so the mechanism is recorded and the figure is not.

So a seat is $37.45 a month, or $449.40 a year, for access and no data. That is also, to the cent, what a whole Starter plan costs during the sale. And the seat charge landed identically on the struck-through price and the discounted one, which means the sale does not apply to seats.

Model two lines, not one. Cost per rep you will field, and cost per credit they will burn. They are separate meters and only one of them scales with the work.

Where the credits actually go

The rest of the breakdown, from the same page on the same date:

ActionUnitCredits
Reveal a verified email1 address1
Reveal a phone number1 number5
Export to CSV1–25 results1
Export to CRM1 result1
API call1–25 results1
AI search5 prompts1
Buyer intent1 topic per company or contact1
De-anonymised IP address1 successful identification2
Conversation intelligence1 recorded call8

Two rows deserve a second look. Exporting to CSV costs one credit per twenty-five records. Exporting to your CRM costs one credit per record. Moving the same hundred contacts into Salesforce rather than into a spreadsheet costs twenty-five times as much, and the pricing page does not draw attention to it.

Conversation intelligence bills eight credits a recorded call. A rep taking twenty calls a day spends 160 credits a day on recordings alone, 3,200 in a working month, 38,400 in a year. That is eight times the entire Starter allowance, from one rep, before a single contact has been revealed.

Annual credits expire, and the annual plan is the discounted one

Monthly plans roll unused credits forward and let them accumulate to twice the plan limit. Annual plans grant everything up front and reset whatever is left at the end of the cycle.

Now read that against the sale, which applies to annual plans. The cheaper unit price is attached to the plan that confiscates what you do not spend. If your consumption is lumpy, and prospecting usually is, the discount is conditional on a consumption pattern you cannot promise in advance.

The page also disagrees with itself about who can stop a rep spending the pool. The plan comparison lists credit allocation as a Premium feature. The FAQ says limiting credit usage per user is available on Scale plans, which is the tier above it. Get that answered before buying Premium expecting it, because on a shared pool with no cap, one rep working a phone-heavy territory can spend the team's year.

Against the vendors it gets compared with

Lusha's advantage over ZoomInfo and Cognism is not coverage. It is that you can read the price, buy it this afternoon, and compute the unit cost without speaking to anyone. Neither of the other two publishes a figure, and Cognism will not say how many credits a tier includes.

The disadvantage is the same fact viewed from the other side. A published meter is still a meter, and this one is calibrated so that the phone numbers Lusha is known for are the most expensive thing on it. Apollo bundles sequencing and a dialer into its published price. Lusha sells data and stops there.

Setting Lusha Up

Free tier, no card, and you can be revealing contacts inside ten minutes. That makes evaluation genuinely cheap, as long as you measure the right thing while it is free.

  • Test coverage on phone numbers, not on emails. Forty free credits a month is eight revealed numbers. A small sample, but a real one if you spend it on accounts you already know the answers for.
  • Count credits before you count seats. The slider prices the plan from credit volume. Seats are $37.45 a month each on top and carry no credits.
  • Pick monthly or annual on your usage shape, not on the discount. Annual is cheaper per credit and wipes the remainder at the end of the cycle. Monthly rolls over to twice the limit.
  • Confirm the CRM export rate in writing. The breakdown prices an export to CRM at one credit per record and an export to CSV at one credit per twenty-five, and the vendor's own usage estimator mentions neither.

What the AI actually does

Nothing here acts on its own. Every feature below produces something a person reviews before it goes anywhere.

Lusha MCPLets your own AI query the databaseIncluded on every tierDrafts

The comparison table ticks MCP on all five plans, the free one included — while webhooks are crossed off Free and Starter, and the API on those two tiers is marked strict rate limits.

So the newest integration surface is the most freely given. Lusha hands an external model access on a plan that costs nothing, and rations the older machine interfaces above it.

AI searchFinds contacts from a written prompt5 prompts = 1 creditDrafts

The only rate on the page quoted in prompts rather than records. Five prompts draw one credit, which is the same credit that buys a verified email.

AI recommendationsSuggests which leads or accounts to work1 credit per lead/accountScores

Crossed off Free and Starter, ticked from Pro upward. One credit a lead, so a recommendation costs exactly what revealing that lead's email costs.

De-anonymised IPPuts a company to a website visitor2 credits per identificationScores

Charged only on a successful identification, and at twice the price of an email. Worth setting against Vector, which sells the same capability as a whole product.

Lusha publishes what its AI costs in the same unit as everything else, and that is the point. AI search is 5 prompts to a credit, an AI recommendation is 1 credit a lead, a de-anonymised IP is 2. Set that against the vendors in this directory that name four agents and quantify none of them: Lusha's meter covers its AI on the same rate card as its phone numbers.

And the rate card confirms the meter this review is built on. A phone number is still 5 credits against 1 for a verified email, an export to CRM is one credit per result where an export to CSV is one credit per 1-25 results, and an API call is one credit per 1-25. Read 2026-08-12.

Access note, because it affects how this page was checked. Every automated route to lusha.com returns 403, and its robots.txt now names ClaudeBot under Disallow: / alongside GPTBot and the rest. That is policy, not bot protection, and we did not work around it. Everything above was read off the rendered page by a human and transcribed here.

Strengths and Weaknesses

What Works
  • Publishes the whole meter, action by action, which no other data vendor on this site does.
  • A real free tier with no card, 40 credits a month, enough to test coverage on your own accounts before paying.
  • Cost per credit is computable before purchase, which is impossible with ZoomInfo and Cognism.
  • Monthly plans roll credits over and accumulate to twice the limit, which is more forgiving than the annual plan the discount sits on.
  • Cancel at any time, effective at the end of the cycle, with credits usable until then.
What Does Not
  • A phone number costs five credits, which is the field most buyers are here for.
  • The volume curve is nearly flat: sixteen times the credits buys a fifteen percent better unit price.
  • Seats cost $37.45 a month and carry no credits, and the sale does not discount them.
  • Annual credits are wiped at the end of the cycle, and annual is the plan carrying the discount.
  • The page contradicts itself on which tier can cap a rep's credit usage, Premium or Scale.

Lusha Pricing

Entry price$449.40/yrRead from the vendor's page on 2026-08-12
Billing modelusageScales with what you consume
How you buySelf-serveBuy it today without talking to anyone
Free tierYesEvaluate before you commit

Every paid tier is billed yearly and no monthly option is offered. The cards badge 25%, 30% and 35% off against struck-through figures of $49.90, $249.90 and $463.65, none of which is a price a buyer can select. Credit volume, set by a slider, moves the figure more than the tier name does. Source: lusha.com/pricing, read in a rendered browser 2026-08-12.

We previously treated the struck-through figure as the real price and the lower one as a promotion. That was the wrong way round, and the page now makes it plain. There is no monthly billing on any paid tier and no billing toggle anywhere. The only figure a buyer can select is the lower one; the higher one exists to be crossed out.

PlanStruck throughSelectableCredits / yearPer credit
Freen/a$040 a monthn/a
Starter$49.90$37.454,800$0.094
Pro, slider at 24k$227.40$171.4524,000$0.086
Premium, slider at 48k$463.65$308.7048,000$0.077
Premium, slider at 120k$977.40$754.95120,000$0.076
Scalen/aQuoteCustomVendor states 50%+ off per credit

The discount grows as the slider moves, and that is where the volume pricing actually lives. A badge above the slider reads additional credits: 30% off at 24k, 35% off at 48k and 40% off at 72k and beyond. Lusha expresses volume as a deeper discount from a number nobody pays rather than as a lower unit rate, which is why the per-credit column barely moves while the badges climb.

One line for the model, recorded as a mechanism rather than a figure. Seats beyond the included two on Pro and five on Premium are added with a stepper and grant no credits at all — seats and credits are separate purchases. We measured the increment on the old ladder and have not re-measured it on this one, so the behaviour is published and the number is not.

The Verdict

3.9

The only data vendor here that publishes its meter, which makes it both the easiest to model and the easiest to catch: a phone number costs five credits against an email's one, sixteen times the volume buys fifteen percent off the unit price, and the annual plan carrying the discount is the same plan that deletes whatever you do not spend.

Buy it if
  • You want a published price and a unit cost you can compute before any sales call
  • Email is the bulk of your motion and phone numbers are occasional
  • You are one rep or a small team, where a five-seat floor elsewhere is dead weight
  • You want to test data quality on your own territory before committing anything
Skip it if
  • Your motion is phone-first, where the meter runs at five times the rate
  • You sell into Europe, where Cognism is built for the job and Lusha is not
  • Your consumption is lumpy and an annual reset would burn credits you paid for
  • You want sequencing or dialing bundled in, which Apollo publishes a price for

Can it take a payment?

Full tracker →
No payment

Books meetings or resolves the call and hands off. Taking money is out of scope for the product as sold.

Questions people actually ask

Why is Lusha so expensive?
Because the unit is a credit rather than a contact, and the things people buy Lusha for cost the most credits. A phone number is five, an email is one, a recorded call analysed by conversation intelligence is eight. At list prices a credit runs between $0.106 and $0.125 depending on plan, so a revealed phone number costs roughly 53 to 62 cents. The bill tracks how hard your team dials, not how many people are on the team.
How much does Lusha cost per month?
Read on 2026-08-12, with every paid card marked billed yearly: Free is $0 with 40 credits a month, Starter shows $37.45 against a struck-through $49.90, Pro runs $171.45 to $188.95 and Premium $308.70 to $754.95 depending on where the credit slider sits. Those starting figures come with fixed credit allowances, and the price rises with the allowance rather than with the tier name. Pro at 26,400 credits a year is $249.90 a month.
How do I get Lusha for free?
There is a permanent free plan: 40 credits a month, one seat, no card required. Forty credits is forty email reveals or eight phone numbers, which makes it a coverage test rather than a working plan. Spend it on accounts whose contact details you already know so the result means something.
Do Lusha credits roll over?
On monthly plans, yes: unused credits roll forward and accumulate up to twice your plan limit while you stay subscribed. On annual plans, no. All credits are granted up front and anything unused is reset at the end of the annual cycle.
How many credits does a phone number cost on Lusha?
Five. A verified email is one, a de-anonymised IP address is two, and a recorded call run through conversation intelligence is eight. Exports are metered separately: one credit per twenty-five records to CSV, but one credit per record to your CRM.
Does the Lusha API cost extra?
There is no separate API rate published. API access starts on Pro, and an API call returning one to twenty-five results consumes one credit from the same pool the rest of the product draws on. Free and Starter have API access with rate limits described only as strict.
Is Lusha better than ZoomInfo or Cognism?
It is a different purchase rather than a better one. Lusha publishes a price, a credit table and a free tier, so you can model it and test it alone. ZoomInfo and Cognism publish neither price nor credit allowance and start with a sales process. On European coverage and compliance posture, Cognism is built for the job and Lusha is not.

Others in Data & Research

See all →

Where we write about this

All posts →