How Much Is HeyReach? $79 Flat, 40 Actions a Day

HeyReach is $79 a month, read 12 August 2026.

It is priced flat rather than per seat, which in a category where the competition charges by the person is the entire reason agencies buy it. Whether it is actually cheaper depends on one number, and this directory does not hold that number: how many LinkedIn sender accounts the $79 covers.

So this page does two things. It publishes what is known with dates on it, including the daily and weekly action ceilings the vendor prints and most of its competitors do not, and it is explicit about the allowance behind the flat rate being a gap rather than an inference.

It also has to carry a warning that no pricing page in this category carries, because a LinkedIn automation purchase is not like buying a sequencer. The asset at risk is a personal account that usually belongs to the person using it rather than to the company paying for the tool, and it carries a connection graph that cannot be repurchased at any price.

What does HeyReach cost?

$79 a month, flat, self-serve, with no free tier. Read 12 August 2026. That is $948 a year on the monthly basis [computed], and no annual rate is held in this repo.

It is the fifth of seven published prices in the LinkedIn category here, so it sits in the middle of a spread running from $39 to $119.99.

One of the eight tools in this category carries a free tier and seven of eight can be bought without a sales call. The eighth publishes no price at all.

The number that decides it is missing

Correction: the $79 is per sender, and the category priced beside it

The $79 is charged per sender, not per workspace. That closes the question the section above leaves open, and it closes it in the direction that is worse for the flat-rate argument. A sender is a connected LinkedIn account, so the allowance behind the rate is one, and the per-account table above should be read with its last column set to $79 times the number of accounts rather than as an open question.

What per sender does to the table above

At one account HeyReach is $79 against Dripify at $59 and La Growth Machine at $70, so two per-seat competitors undercut it. At three accounts it is $237 [computed] against Dripify at $177 and La Growth Machine at $210. At ten it is $790 [computed] against $590 and $700. The shape that made this product look like an agency bargain, one flat rate covering many client accounts, is not the shape being sold. Flat means flat per sender rather than flat per company, and every published comparison in this category that treats those as the same thing is wrong by whatever your account count is.

What is still not held

Seven of the eight rows publish a rate and seven can be bought without a sales call. One carries a free tier. What none of the eight publishes, and what this repo holds for none of them, is a restriction rate, which is the figure a buyer in this category actually wants and the one nobody sells. No annual rate is held for HeyReach either, so the $948 elsewhere on this page is twelve monthly payments rather than a year's price.

How many LinkedIn accounts does $79 cover?

This repo records the model as flat and the rate as $79 and stops there. That is a genuine limitation on a pricing page and pretending otherwise would be worse than admitting it, because the whole argument for a flat rate against a per-seat competitor lives inside that one figure. At one account the per-seat tools undercut it. At ten it is not close.

Read the last column as a question rather than an answer. If $79 covers one account, three of the four rows favour the competition. If it covers ten, HeyReach is roughly a seventh of the cost of the nearest per-seat alternative at that scale, which is the shape agencies believe they are buying and the shape this page cannot confirm.

Establish the allowance before you compare anything. It is one line on a pricing page and it changes the answer by a factor of seven.

The limits HeyReach publishes, and what they add up to

40 actions a day at maximum, 25 by default, and 200 a week, read 25 August 2026.

Those three numbers are more useful than they look, and the third one is derivable from the first: 40 a day across five working days is exactly 200 [computed]. So the weekly ceiling is not an independent constraint, it is the daily maximum with a working week assumed, which tells you the vendor expects weekend inactivity to look like a human's.

The last row carries the same conditional as everything else on this page and is worth running anyway, because it is the only unit cost available in this category and nobody prints it. At the default pace, one account's automation costs about sixteen cents an action if the flat rate covers a single account. Every extra account the rate covers divides that figure again.

Two cautions. LinkedIn publishes no official automation ceilings at all, which one competitor states on its own site, so every number circulating in this market is inferred by practitioners rather than sanctioned. And limits count per account rather than per tool, so running three tools at 25 actions a day each shows LinkedIn 75 on one account.

What the product takes from you to work

A session, and HeyReach is one of only two vendors in this category that says so in public.

It accepts either an exported session cookie or your LinkedIn email and password. Its architecture is a cloud proxy, and the vendor describes its own version precisely: "HeyReach gives each LinkedIn account its own dedicated static residential proxy, a real IP address that never rotates and is never shared with another account" [vendor, read 25 August 2026].

That is a documentation finding rather than a safety finding, and the distinction matters. Three of the LinkedIn tools in this directory return nothing at all when their domains are searched for the words cookie, proxy and IP address, and two of them run while your laptop is off, which means they hold a credential they have chosen not to describe. HeyReach describes it. Documentation is not safety; it is the only part you can audit before paying.

The exposure is real either way. A third party holds a live credential to an account you personally own, and acts with it when you are not there to watch what it did.

The compliance sentence, quoted rather than summarised

"LinkedIn's User Agreement explicitly bans software that automates connecting, messaging, liking, and commenting" [vendor, read 25 August 2026].

That is HeyReach describing the legality of its own product, on its own site. It is the clearest statement any vendor in this category makes and it is against the vendor's short-term interest, which is a reason to weight it.

Read what it means for your purchase rather than for the vendor's honesty. No tool in this category is permitted by the platform it runs on. Choosing between them does not move you inside the rules, it moves you between clauses of the same User Agreement, and the risk lands on the member account rather than on the company buying the software. The architecture page maps each shape onto the clause that names it.

The vendor's own company page was removed

On 25 March 2026, LinkedIn removed or restricted HeyReach's company page and several executive profiles. The company published its own account of it.

HeyReach's framing is worth quoting because it is correct and it costs them something: "A vendor page ban and an individual account restriction are two separate things. Your account's safety depends entirely on your own account's behavior, sending volume, pace, and consistency, not on what happens to HeyReach's brand presence" [vendor, read 25 August 2026].

Treat the second sentence as the vendor's position rather than an established fact. Nobody outside LinkedIn can see whether tool attribution feeds restriction decisions, and LinkedIn publishes nothing that would settle it. This site's own ledger also flags a widely repeated claim that HeyReach pivoted away from LinkedIn within weeks as uncorroborated, and the vendor has published continued LinkedIn operation since.

What a buyer should take from it is narrower and more useful than either version. The vendor you depend on is visibly in conflict with the platform it resells access to, which is a supplier risk to price into a twelve-month plan rather than a reason to expect your own account to be touched.

The field this site built for exactly this question is empty

This directory defines a structured record for LinkedIn tools covering architecture, whether the tool needs a session credential, whether a dedicated IP is claimed, the vendor's compliance wording verbatim, and any published daily limits.

Not one of the eight LinkedIn tools here has that record populated.

Everything in the two sections above therefore comes from a published post rather than from structured data, which means it is not rendered on the tool page, not checked by the price-consistency script, and not comparable across vendors without reading prose. That is a defect in this site rather than in HeyReach, it is stated here because a page telling you to audit a vendor's documentation should audit its own, and it is the first thing a maintainer should fix on this record.

There is no free tier, and the alternative costs $17

One of the eight tools in this category has a free tier and HeyReach is not it.

The genuine zero-cost alternative is not a competitor's free plan, it is not automating at all. This site has costed a complete manual LinkedIn motion at $17 a month, using free LinkedIn search and manual sending, and its ceiling is roughly fifty personalised messages a week. Against HeyReach's published 200 a week at maximum pace, automation buys about four times the volume [computed] for $62 a month more, plus exposure to a User Agreement clause the vendor itself quotes.

That is the trade stated plainly, and it is a reasonable trade for some teams. It is a terrible one for a person whose fifteen-year connection graph is their main professional asset and who has not read the clause.

When HeyReach is the wrong purchase

When you are running one account. The flat rate is built for many, two per-seat competitors undercut it at a single seat, and the value proposition inverts.

Also when the account you would automate is the one you also use by hand. Running automation on a personal account you sign into daily creates concurrent sessions, which one competitor warns about on its own product page, and the whole exposure sits on the one profile you cannot afford to lose.

And when you want a sanctioned route. There is exactly one, it is Sales Navigator at $119.99 a seat, it is a research surface rather than a sending tool, and its export restrictions are deliberate. Nobody in this category claims LinkedIn approval and one competitor states outright that it is not an official LinkedIn product.

How to check this before you pay

• Find how many sender accounts $79 covers. It is one line on the pricing page and it is the entire comparison against the per-seat tools. If you cannot find it, ask in writing before entering a card. Five minutes.
• Search the vendor domain for the words cookie, proxy and IP address. Record how many pages return each and what they say. HeyReach names its proxy type; three tools in this category return nothing. Ten minutes.
• Read the onboarding documentation before you buy, not after. If the steps end with pasting a session cookie or entering LinkedIn credentials, you know which architecture you are buying and whose account absorbs the restriction. Five minutes.
• Decide whose LinkedIn account this runs on, in writing, with that person. The account is usually theirs rather than the company's, and the connection graph is the one asset in the stack that cannot be repurchased. Ten minutes, and it is the only step on this list that is not about software.

Fail threshold: if the onboarding flow is not documented publicly at all, stop there. A vendor that will not show you how its own product connects before you pay has told you something.

What breaks in month three

An account, and the way it happens is boring. Practitioner accounts describe restrictions triggered by a session appearing from a new geography, which is mechanically what a cloud tool does the first time it runs. One thread describes three separate restrictions with no automation involved at all, purely from VPN and extension use, and its author writes that the triggers keep shifting.

Second is the identity check, where an account is restricted pending a government ID upload. That is a hard stop for plenty of people and it is not a thing you can appeal your way around.

Third is the supplier, as March 2026 demonstrated. And fourth is the limit itself: at 25 actions a day the default pace, a campaign takes as long as it takes, and the temptation to push toward 40 is exactly the pressure the ceiling exists to resist.

So what should you budget?

$948 a year on the monthly basis [computed from $79 a month], and find the account allowance before you compare that to anything.

If you run many client accounts, this is the cheapest published shape in the category and the flat rate is why. If you run one, buy a per-seat tool or buy nothing, because two competitors undercut $79 at a single seat and a $17 manual motion reaches a quarter of the volume with none of the exposure.

And budget the risk properly, which means naming the person whose account carries it before the invoice, not after the restriction.

What this page does not know